News from the World of Archaeology: January/February 2015

Mummies receive CT scans

Missouri, USA

Medicine recently teamed up with the Saint Louis Art Museum and the university’s 

Among the early findings: One of the mummies already was known to have a brain, but scans revealed she also still has lungs. In many mummies, lungs typically were removed prior to burial. The scientists—radiologists with the university’s Mallinckrodt In- stitute of Radiology—discovered that the same mummy also has an array of small objects around her head. It appears to be a headdress or embel- lished shroud, but other possibilities include packing material or debris.

The scientists were surprised to find that a second mummy appeared to be significantly shorter than his sarcophagus. Further scanning revealed that his head had been dis- lodged from his body, perhaps when grave robbers ransacked his tomb. They found an item on his chest that may have been a burial amulet missed by grave robbers. They hope to use the scanning data to reconstruct the item with a 3-D printer. 

The mummies’ burial containers and wrappings identify each by name. The Saint Louis Art Museum’s mummy is Amen-Nestawy-Nakht, a male; the Kemper Art Museum mummies are Pet-Menekh, also a male, and Henut- Wedjebu, a female.

—Washington University, Saint Louis 

4000-year-old 

Animal sacrifice at Megiddo

Kozani, Greece

W

The archaeologists excavating the Great Temple—Dr Matthew J Adams, Prof David Ussishkin and Prof Israel Finkelstein—postulate that the corridors (favissae) served to ritually discard the bones after the animals’ sacrifice. We cannot know why they stored the bones, but it could have had to do with cultic belief in the sacred nature of the sacrificial refuse.

The bones themselves were examined by Dr Brian Heesse and Dr Paula Wapnish from Pennsylvania State University, who discovered that different locations along the corridors were used to store different debris from different stages of the animals’ carcass processing. Most of the remains found—more than 80 per cent—are of young sheep and goats. The rest were cattle.

The structured deposit of the remains “lend support to the sanctity of the process and suggest that there was a ritual dimension to the discard process,” suggest the researchers in an article published last April in The American Journal of Archaeology.

The temple was one of the largest structures in the Near East of its time (Early Bronze Age, 3300–2500 b.c.). The corridors with the bones were in its rear. The bones in the 

Also, the western corridor contained lots of limb bones, while the eastern one had mainly head fragments but few limbs. This bolsters the hypothesis that each corridor was used as a deposit for sacral refuse resulting from different rituals or different stages of a ritual. That’s about all that can be said about the religious rituals at Megiddo at the Early Bronze Age, says Finkelstein. Precious little else is known about sacrificial activity in temples in ancient Israel and the Levant at that time period.

It would be reasonable to assume that animals were sacrificed at the temple from its construction until it was abandoned about a hundred years later, but that cannot be proved. Archaeologists are divided on why the temple, in which so much had been invested, was abandoned: some think there is evidence for a “killer earthquake” that hit Megiddo, which is located on the Carmel fault, but others reject that theory.

The temple was discovered in 2010 by the Tel Aviv University Megiddo Expedition, which has been working at the tel since 1992. Although the temple at Tel Megiddo is the biggest of its time—at least found so far—it isn’t the only example of construction on a vast scale to be found in ancient Israel. 

—Ran Shapira, Haaretz 

Rare exhibition coup for university museum 

Michigan, USA

In a few months, the Siegfried Horn Museum at Andrews 

While small, the exhibition, part of a one-year loan agreement with Jordan, will be something of a rarity. In re- cent decades, countries that house remains of the ancient world have become determined to keep archaeological finds within their borders. Partly as a result, many smaller archaeological museums at religious-affiliated schools across the United States, lacking the financial resources to buy works or borrow actively from other collections, are scrambling to increase the museums’ appeal.

For example, in 2005, a dig at Tel Zayit in Israel run by the Pittsburgh Theological Seminary unearthed a stone inscribed with the earliest known specimen of the Hebrew 

“We are not in a position to buy collections of artifacts,” Dr Tappy said. To convey some of the excitement of the find, he said, “there is a small corner of the museum dedicated to the discovery at Tel Zayat.”

Even Andrews University, which is involved in two major digs, has a relatively small museum of six exhibition halls. While there are hopes to move the museum to a larger space, Constance E Gane, its curator, acknowl- edged that getting the funding is difficult and that the school, which had always supported the digs, now faces financial pressures.

—Geraldine Fabrikant, New York Times